Friday, January 3, 2014

The Future of The Commonwealth

 What will become of The Bluegrass in ten years? Questions like these depend solely on teens and students, throughout Kentucky. If we don’t recognize this and change something, the consequences could be detrimental.


    When I went to the Capitol and Metro Hall this weekend and talked with people on the senior staff and even the Governor  himself I was surprised at what was important to each of these officials and how much of it I didn't know. They started using acronyms and it was like they were speaking in tongues. I mean I know it isn't a huge deal since I'm only a freshman, but it's like I want to know what's happening within our government from now on.  Students need to be watchdogs as well as reporters and voters.


   We as a city, state, nation, and world should look to John Locke’s concept of tabula rasa: individuals are born without built-in mental content and that their knowledge comes from experience and perception. Because the current scheme is one of conformity and obedience and it is inadequate. One needs to be exposed to these things at a young age so that later on one isn’t shell-shocked when exposed to ideals that differ from the mandatory form.


   This is why learning about social interactions (past and present is so important.) Yes, sure, maybe some senior in high school could spout of some facts about the American Revolution, but what about it’s relevance? The Revolution in America, as anything and everything does, shapes us as a nation and that configuration affects our world as we know it. That’s not to say that knowing what happened and when isn’t important, those things still need to be taught, but with much more of an emphasis on how what happened and when ties into you as an individual. A person is so much more likely to learn when a class is focused on their timeframe and their life.


   So the connection is important, but so is the learning and discussion of current topics. Do you know how many high school students read the newspaper? Like two. Not that in this day and age you even need to. You can get all of your information elsewhere, via the Internet. But, where students learn to get this information and their comprehension is very important. We need current event classes or a specific allotted time for an alternative. There are really sketchy unreliable sources even within our city, but students trust them regardless. Students need to be educated about how to decipher a non subjective source, and how to respond to it in an enlightened and beneficial way.


   Plus, we need to have students questioning our government based upon Locke’s and Jesuit theories. Teens should undergo exposure to the world around them, learn from experience, gain perspective, and strive for excellence, all fueled by education based upon what is relevant to them. I bet you a million dollars ¾ of Kentucky teens don’t know about LIFT. I bet you a trillion dollars that most Louisvillian high school students couldn’t name the Lieutenant governor or tell me who Jack Conway is. Information like that is vital knowledge. Things like our politicians and their decisions affect all Kentuckians, students included. Students need to be trained, especially seeing as they will be the ones that are voting in the next elections, an outcome that will have power over the entirety of the Commonwealth. We have to educate our students if they are expected to be the future, as was the thought of our 35th president, John F. Kennedy. We need to guarantee ourselves a well-rounded, knowledgeable, comprehensive, promising, future.

Friday, November 15, 2013

Underground Culture: Sydney Says.


To go to Sydney's post click this. To go to Sydney's Blog click this.

 The mainstream and underground have been eliminated. Sydney said this is because the Internet made everything available,  but what I agree with her upon is that the internet has made a new underground. It's special because the Internet has this potential to reach millions upon millions of people, yet exclusive communities still find a way to thrive. Although now you don't have to rummage through a pile of records to find an unknown song, all you have to do is type in the lyrics to Google and there you have it.

Crime Relevance

http://www.whas11.com/news/crimetracker/Change-231586121.html
http://www.whas11.com/news/crimetracker/Judge-orders-Robby-Albarado-to-get-new-trial-232070711.html
http://www.whas11.com/news/crimetracker/Louisville-woman-accused-of-using-rocks-to-break-into-ATM-machine-231595081.html

The stories listed above are examples of stories that ought not be covered by the local news station, WHAS. But that doesn't mean all crime stories are unsuitable for coverage, there is some crime that demands to be reported upon.

Based on the yardstick of newsworthiness. We can determine if a crime story is newsworthy if it is (but not limited to) one of the following:

  • Someone whose identity is unknown is linked to a series of crimes. Like a string of murders or robberies that were likely committed by the same person. This affects a large amount of people until the criminal is caught, which puts civilians at danger.
  • Someone that has committed a crime whose whereabouts are unknown. This affects everyone in an area until the person is caught for the aforementioned reasons.
  • A kidnapping. It affects others in the community and it's a good way to get out the information and warn people to keep an eye open.
  • If an important figure is killed. Sometimes this develops into another kind of story, like if it's a political figure it becomes a politics story.

If some obscure member of a community dies it isn't grounds for a story. It's a cop out (pun intended) all an outlet has to do is listen to the police scanner and send a truck to interview the person's family about how he or she was such a good person. This violates the journalistic yardstick of enterprise.

A Day In the Life of WHAS

WHAS11 is a local station is Louisville, KY promising to report the facts, but do they really hold true to their motto: on your side? Here's what they reported on October 15th, 2013.

First block, the top story was three children were found with E. Coli, their connection being that they had all visited Huber's Petting Zoo in Starlight, Indiana. This story lasted two minutes and discussed what E. Coli does and how to avoid it. This story is newsworthy due to the fact that potentially E. Coli could affect Kentuckiana for a while. However, as the stories continued on their importance diminished. There were stories like the David Camm trial, a murder that happened miles away, 13 years ago. His third trial should be covered once, the day of the decision, not for almost 2 minutes everyday. Western Middle School was evacuated due to a faulty heater, there was no fire and no injuries, also no need for coverage. The Blind Pig restaurant is closing because they owe rent, minute spent on an instance not out of the ordinary. Next and stupidest of all, WHAS spent a whopping 2 minutes 30 seconds on a showing a video of a police chase that occurred in 2012 .The man being chased was caught the day of and no one was hurt, the only new information is that he has a court date. 2:46 was spent on weather which is newsworthy, but, I don't know if  that much time should be allotted for it. There was approximately 3 minutes spent on sports which was ridiculous because it engages only a minute audience. 10 minutes was spent on news, leaving 14:54 for breaks. There is a serious problem when half of your new cast is commercials and promos.

There were some relevant stories however, WHAS reported on a case of arson, asking for the whereabouts of the suspected perpetrator. And they spent an appropriate :30 seconds on a job fair in Indiana because it is of human interest. They also covered the Government Shutdown, but a questionable angle was taken on the matter. They interviewed a couple in J-Town with a special circumstance, they should have been more inclusive and made it marketable to a broader audience.

Newsworthiness



What makes a new story worthy of coverage? It follows the principles and yardsticks of journalism. Now if you aren't in my journalism class you are probably completely confused. The principles and yardsticks are unofficial regulations known in the journalistic world. The principles are a list of nine determining factors decided upon by an organization known as the Project of Excellence in Journalism that dictate what a story is supposed to do in order for it to be worthy of coverage. The seven yardsticks are put out by gradethenews.org and strive for a similar goal of determining the quality of a given story.


  • Truth
  • Loyalty
  • Verification
  • Independence
  • Watchdog
  • Forum
  • Make the Important Interesting
  • Inclusivity
  • Room for Dissent
  • Newswortiness
  • Context
  • Explanation
  • Local Relevance
  • Civic Contribution
  • Enterprise
  • Fairness
In determining whether a story should be reported on or not the easiest thing to critique it upon is  newsworthiness. Gradethenews.org  dictates that newsworthiness is based on the question does this have a lasting effect (six months or more) on a wide audience (10,000 people)? With a local news outlet you may change that a little, does this affect most of the city for at least three weeks.

The Gene 'Synder' Fiasco

So I'm sure everyone in the Greater Louisville Metro Area has heard of the disaster that is "Gene Synder Apocalypse 2K13. Basically, some poor guy switched the 'n' and the 'y' in Snyder and ended up with 'Synder.' And so why is this news? It's not really. The story isn't really newsworthy because while it does affect drivers in Louisville it doesn't in the long run. They fixed it fast enough for it to not be a big deal. Also there weren't any accidents to come out of the misspelling, no "Breaking News: Driver causes 15 car pile up while craning his neck to read a sign he drives by passively everyday." Yet we see this:

http://www.wdrb.com/story/23687360/misspelled-interstate-signs-pop-up-across-louisville
http://www.wdrb.com/story/23712516/gene-snyder-freeway-signs-corrected
http://www.wave3.com/story/23689585/big-signs-feature-big-mistake
http://snyder-signs-new.rsspump.com/?key=2013101507127f.misspelled-interstate-signs-pop
http://www.whas11.com/news/Go-north-on-Bardstown-Rd-until-you-get-to-the-Gene-Sydner-Freeway-Wait-what--227677981.html

And even more randomly this:
http://seattletimes.com/html/nationworld/2022054537_apxmisspelledroadsign.html

I mean I know since most news outlets are in an agreement to let them share stories, but if we look at a map we see this:



So Seattle Times this is not at all newsworthy to your city and it's citizens, because it isn't even newsworthy to ours.

Television Response

You go to school, ride the bus home, sit on the couch, and what? Turn on the television. For citizens of the 21st century it's second nature, if a television is on we're paying attention. But how has TV impacted us?

First, television keeps us indoors. The average American spends 7 hours a day watching television. This keeps us form doing something social, like hanging out with friends or going to church. (But I mean we're all cynical and satanic nowadays anyway.) Television made us more introverted than any medium that preceded it. 

Second, TV influences our monetary habits in a negative way. It's great for advertisers because television makes us spend more. We see it on TV, through blatant or discrete advertising, and think, "I have to have that." Because when we see it on TV it becomes real, if it's not on TV it must not be legit.

Third, politics for years was a black and white race. Not anymore - it's in technicolor. To compete in a political campaign you must advertise on TV. It goes back to the whole thing about if it's on television it's real. If someone isn't on debate a on TV or has election commercials than that person isn't important. This marginalizes any social class except the rich because ads are expensive, and to really be effective you must use repetition to get it drilled into your viewers heads.

Last, TV changes the way we as society perceive the world. Television control what's cool and what's not.If it's real it's on TV. So the only thing that's real is a binary - The Kardashians or Honey Boo Boo. TV distorts and blurs the view of the average American.